Top latest Five h4831sc load data Urban news
Top latest Five h4831sc load data Urban news
Blog Article
Considering the fact that there will not appear to be any "Formal" Load Data around for this Load, can several of you supply a starting point with this mixture and issues to consider when Doing work this Load up?
They may have carried out identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to have the more recent SC Model but have now switched again. Preferably you'd like about 100% loading density. For those who have adequate circumstance capacity for your H4831(extensive) that you are most likely greater off.
It truly is most likely that no further more discussion is needed, by which scenario we propose beginning a completely new thread. If nonetheless you really feel your response is needed you could continue to achieve this.
Caution making use of SC or SSC produced loads with prolonged Slice, again off and work up. Use Risk-free loading approaches.
In any case, I knew the two lbs of H4831SC used the exact same data, but I did not know irrespective of whether there was everything different among a pound of powder labeled "Serious" and a single not so labeled. A simply call to Hodgdon confirmed which they were in fact identical and the only variation was The emblem about the label.
I realize, rough occasions. H4831SC will definitely function, I just didn't like the situation density when loaded extensive. I do not recall powder cost off the very best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which can be in which I generally aim to be. In the circumstance making use of what you've got (and what I should have completed) I would get started with the tip in the bearing surface of your bullet suitable on the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you look for a velocity node.
I am employing it that has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as precise. RL22 did well but I used to be slightly concerned about temp balance. I feel I am at seventy two grains and get all around 2850ish fps
Like mentioned previously mentioned, identical stuff. Everything differs h4831 vs h4831sc is the scale with the kernels. I did listen to someplace that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I have no idea if that is definitely genuine or not but would make sense to me. I exploit SC due to the fact that may be what I found in the eight lb jug and it really works.
You might both: 1) Continue on and also have the firearm(s) mentioned underneath quickly faraway from your buying cart:
Additionally, it h4831 vs h4831sc goes on to declare that due to the fshorter grains, that load density could possibly be somewhat better.
I have had identical working experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders would not shoot properly h4831 vs h4831sc with anything at all except Fed215's. Some parts just Will not play perfectly with other. Appears like you've got decided on 3 fantastic powders, I'd hope at the least one of them to shoot.
The "SC" means Limited Minimize. I have not discovered a difference between both powder dut I don't think I would blend them.
I frequently always have the sc Edition. Using a powder measure it hangs up fewer as a consequence of shorter kernels and I believe allows far more constant metering so significantly less time you're taking trickling in the last bit of charge to help make pounds. So basically the SC saves you periods
The fact that the H4831 is without a doubt a slower burning powder is specifically why you're viewing larger velocities received with that powder, in contrast to Anything you've seen Using the IMR stuff.